← Stackzilla Blog
The Monitoring Stack That Keeps Teams Sane
Published April 28, 2026
· 5 min read
· Datadog, Grafana, monitoring, observability, DevOps, Prometheus
Most teams know they should be monitoring their applications. Far fewer have a setup that actually tells them something useful before users start filing bug reports. The difference is usually not the tools — it is how they are configured.
There is a version of application monitoring that generates thousands of alerts nobody reads and dashboards that are only looked at during post-mortems. Most teams have been there. The goal is a setup that reduces the time between "something is wrong" and "we know what to fix."
The good news is that the tooling has gotten dramatically better. The harder part is knowing what to instrument, what to alert on, and how to make the information available to the people who need it.
**The Three Layers of Observability**
Metrics, logs, and traces are the standard framing, and it holds up well in practice. Metrics tell you something changed — your error rate went from 0.1% to 4%, your p95 latency doubled. Logs tell you what specifically happened at a point in time. Traces tell you why — following a request across every service it touched and finding where time was spent.
A team that has only one of these layers is working with incomplete information. Metrics without logs means knowing something broke without knowing what. Logs without traces means debugging distributed systems by reconstructing request paths from log timestamps, which is slow and error-prone.
**Prometheus and Grafana**
Prometheus and Grafana became the de facto open-source stack for infrastructure metrics, and for good reason. Prometheus has a pull-based model that works naturally in containerized environments, a powerful query language (PromQL), and a huge ecosystem of exporters. Grafana turns those metrics into dashboards that can combine data from Prometheus, Loki for logs, and Tempo for traces in one interface.
The setup cost is real. Getting Prometheus configured correctly, writing alert rules that are sensitive enough to catch real problems but quiet enough not to produce alert fatigue, and building Grafana dashboards that are actually useful takes time. It is an investment that pays off when production problems hit.
**Datadog: Integrated and Expensive**
Datadog bundles metrics, logs, APM traces, and infrastructure monitoring into one product. The integration story is its biggest advantage — correlating a spike in latency with a specific deployment and the logs from the affected service takes seconds rather than context-switching between multiple tools.
**What to Alert On**
Alert fatigue is the silent killer of monitoring programs. A team that gets paged three times a week for things that resolve themselves stops treating pages as urgent. The discipline is ruthless: only alert on things that require human action, make every alert actionable, and set thresholds that reflect actual impact.
Error rate, latency percentiles, and availability are the starting points. Everything beyond that should be earned by a real production incident that would have been caught earlier by a specific metric.
**Sentry for Application Errors**
Sentry occupies a specific niche that neither Datadog nor Prometheus covers well: surfacing application-level exceptions with full stack traces, grouped by fingerprint, with context about what the user was doing. When your error rate spikes in Grafana, Sentry tells you what error is causing it. The combination of infrastructure observability and application error tracking gives teams the full picture.
Read the full article on Stackzilla →